changes.
| | h1. Performance |
| | |
| | HSCALE is designed to as little overhead to your database application as possible. But nothing comes for free ;-) |
| | |
| | h2. MySQL Proxy |
| | |
| | First of all there is the overhead of using MySQL Proxy. This adds at least another network hop to your client server communication. Benchmark show that in a typical scenario (MySQL Proxy on different host than MySQL server) an overhead of 0.02 milliseconds per query (status: 2008-05-05). |
| | |
| | h2. HSCALE |
| | |
| | If you add HSCALE to the scenario above it will add up to 0.3 ms to each query compared to the MySQL server. |
| | |
| | h2. Benchmarks |
| | |
| | * [http://pero.blogs.aprilmayjune.org/2008/05/05/benchmark-mysql-proxy-and-hscale/] |
| | * [http://pero.blogs.aprilmayjune.org/2008/05/05/update-benchmark-hscale-with-mysql-proxy-070-svn-against-061/] |